In no known universe is an RTX 2060 a 'low end' card and realistically shouldn't be considered as so. TLDR This whole thread is some PCMR crap. It's easy to see how some feel like they were duped. This does not line up with the intercepts stated goals of making a more approachable game. This is just leaving a bunch of people and educators behind. is supposed to be intended for the masses. No hardware reviewer considers it a legitimate part of of the main stack. 90 is the gold plated halo replacement for titans. 60 is in fact mid tier, 70 is high, 80 is enthusiast. Apologists can claim a 60 class card is low end and 80 only mid tier all day. Traditionally that target becomes the recommended spec. I mean most developers who want to make money will target a system that a majority of potential customers have, or are willing to purchase. That said, I am getting the game as planned because I've been waiting a long time for this but I do fully understand people's 'concerns' regarding these insane (for what it is) system requirements. But dropping a system requirement like this, like a week before launch with little input on why they're so high is less than ideal. The developers could clear a *lot* of this confusion up and go into a brief bit of detail as to 'why' an RTX 3080 is recommended. New more powerful hardware, games that 'utilise' it and everyone scratching their heads as to just what all that extra computational power is actually doing. That's where I think the main confusion stems from, but this has been a trend for the history of PC gaming. I mean it still looks quite basic (graphically) compared to a lot of not even new titles. Kerbal Space Program 2 looks nothing like it would command that sort of hardware requirements. To be fair I think that's an unfair statement. KSP2 is a 2023 game, is starting with modern hardware. You can play KSP1 without any issues on older hardware.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |